![]() ![]() The combination of armour with IFV's can hold off most enemies and provide a strong attcking force. I prefer mech because of the access to IFV's, some of which come with ATGM's or TOW launchers. Motor has speed and access to more recon, but if you need eight slots of recon then you're using recon wrong. I'm biased because mech is my personal preference. Thanks, I whould like a norad deck but I dont know wheter moterized or mechnazied, can you help. Perhaps not the answer you were looking for but I hope that helps. I have only used a Canadian deck twice, and then went back to coalitions. With a Commonwealth deck, Canadian units make up the "medium" tier of combat ability, while the UK provides the heavier "upper" tier and ANZAC the "lower" tier (I find ANZAC is decent on defense). Canada shines as part of a coalition, Commonwealth or NORAD, since the US/UK/ANZAC can fill in the gaps where Canada is weaker.įor example, Canadian infantry are a little better than American, but lack strong armour, so a NORAD deck can take advantage of Canadian Infantry and American armour. If you want my opinion Canada has some decent units, but by itself I feel it lacks the ability to be a strong contender on offense and defense. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |